By Lee Rice Epstein
Like Graham Locke writing about Anthony Braxton in the 1990s, Cisco
Bradley’s biography of William Parker arrives as the artist seems to be
entering yet another unprecedented phase of his career. Yet, Universal Tonality: The Life and Music of William Parker is a
timely and dynamic picture of the great artist’s travels, to date.
Bradley’s book charts a past that also provides many clues and contextual
narratives that tell us much about where Parker may be heading. As an
unintended companion to the recently released set, which itself contains a
combination of biographical and folkloric reflections, the two work
together to illuminate and challenge much of our current accepted
conceptions of creative music, Black music, and the artistic mission. Like
many contributors (and, surely, readers), I’m a longtime fan of William
Parker’s music, which, like sedimentary layers, continues to build upon
itself in new shades, textures, and depths. Bradley’s book—which I
recommend as highly as Locke’s seminal
Forces in Motion: Anthony Braxton and the Meta-reality of Creative
Music
—is the kind of scholarship that invites a reader to engage with
fundamental and complex ideas about art, its purpose, and the roles of an
audience. Like Locke, Bradley pulls off the feat of bringing the
artist and his music to life, a cliché, of course, but there’s no better
phrase for it. While reading Universal Tonality, I was constantly
dipping in and out of the text to play a recording or look online for
photos or additional materials.
Instead of rehashing the book or presenting some version of my own
findings, what I really wanted to do was talk with Bradley about some of
the ideas that were rattling around after I finished the book. We didn’t
come close to covering everything, but what I hope we may have accomplished
is opening up the door for anybody who is interested in Parker and his
music to jump in, as well as for other writers and researchers to move
forward with their projects. All quoted portions that follow come from two
conversations I had with Bradley in January of this year.
“There are numerous books to still be written. I don’t know if a definitive
book has been written on the loft scene. It’s not a criticism, there’s just
a lot left to be written… There’s a lot to be written on the downtown
scene.” One topic we kept returning to was how many stories there are to be
told. And for those deeply interested in the loft scene and creative music
of free improvisation, the second section, “Early Work,” contains about 100
pages with chapters each on Parker’s playing on the loft scene, especially
with Jemeel Moondoc’s Ensemble Muntu, the music he made with Centering
Dance Music Ensemble and his wife Patricia Nicholson, and his time spent
with Cecil Taylor.
Throughout the second section and into the third section (“Toward the
Universal,” primarily focused on In Order To Survive, Little Huey Creative
Music Orchestra, William Parker Quartet, and Raining On the Moon, among his
other groups), you get a sense of how Parker’s sense of self is reflected
in his earliest interactions: “I always think of something Steve Swell
said, ‘William never really had a careerist moment, he’s still very
dedicated to making sure the community is functioning.’ He’s not one of
those people with ego or attitude. First of all, there’s his monumental
body of work, he tours all over the world, he’s played in 50 countries or
something, and he’s gotten a huge amount of respect. But at the same time,
let’s say from the jazz establishment in the United States, he’s barely on
their radar.”
In many ways, for me, the crucial section of the book is what would most
likely be considered the traditional biographical portion, section one,
titled “Origins.” Truly, the section opens contra tradition, with the
chapter “Enslavement and Resistance: From West Africa to the Carolinas to
Harlem.” Beginning briefly with the Harlem Renaissance, Bradley traces
Parker’s family to the seventh-century Kingdom of Nri, located east of the
Niger River.
Bradley explained: “Part of it is, William spoke so much about his family
and about his history. I don’t think I’ve spoken to someone who has a
memory like him. And he talked about his earliest events in his life, his
parents, his brother, and so forth. He has an impeccable memory. ‘I read
this book when I was 12,’ and not only does he remember the book, he’ll
say, ‘This is what I was thinking when I started reading it.’
“He’s aware of his own consciousness. He talked so much about the things he
experienced, his connection to history, that I felt giving it a deep
context was necessary… There were some surprises in there. The fact that he
was descended from a free Black family in pre-Civil War North Carolina. I
stumbled into that in the record. He talks about Native Americans a lot in
his work, and what I find stunning is, in his own history, it’s right
there. The fact that one of his ancestors escaped slavery and took refuge
among the Lumbee Indians in central North Carolina. There’s this incredible
parallel with his own artistic vision and some of the themes of his work.
And I thought, 'We have to go all the way back.’ Given the limited
resources I can turn to, ‘Let’s go back as far as we can.’”
These reflections of Parker’s artistic vision and the mission of his music,
the communication of tradition, which often re-emerges through a refracted
lens, like the radical settings on Parker’s Inside Songs of Curtis Mayfield
project. Given how much of Parker’s music is steeped in historical
exploration—including some on his latest set, like the stirring Manzanar session—the book feels very much in tune with Parker, the
researcher and storyteller.
“He had a very clear idea of the narrative he wanted for the book. I can’t
overstate that, he really had a story that he wanted to tell. When we sat
down, those stories came out pretty quickly, especially chapters 2 and 3.
We didn’t get to talking about his music until after the first three or
four interviews I did with him. He really wanted to talk about growing up
and a lot of the early influences on him, just as a human being, as a poet,
as a young person.
“He was talking about Amiri Baraka’s poetry, he was talking about Stan
Brakhage’s films. William consider’s Brakhage to be his single greatest
influence. The French New Wave, some of the films I outline in chapter 3,
kind of blew his mind. He was thinking about not only the experimental
visual things they were doing, sometimes with sound sometimes not, it threw
open his mind to other ways of existence. Imagining what the greater world
was to a child growing up in deep poverty in the projects in the South
Bronx.”
Reading these chapters, then pressing play on, say, “Alphaville” from the
“Live At Yoshi’s” quartet session of the Wood Flute Songs set, you
begin to get a sense of how long Parker’s been working through the ideas he
first encountered 60 years ago.
“In a way, William Parker’s a historian. He’s telling stories through his
music. Until I sat down, I didn’t realize how many tributes he had done.
He’s a proactive historical figure, he’s out there defining himself,
defining his own narrative. His music is Black music, and it’s also other
things. He says in the beginning of his career, he identified most closely
with the Black music spiritual school. [Eventually he said,] I’m not going
to be limited by any categories, but I’m also going to embrace these
categories.”
It’s a traditional biography structure to lay down a person’s history and
allow it to build towards the later sections. But, in Parker’s case, so
much of his music reflects backwards that reading these early chapters felt
revelatory. "Early key interviews I did were with Patricia Nicholson, and
the other two crucial ones were with Matthew Shipp and Cooper-Moore. They
were the first two people William suggested I reach out to. They helpd me
understand William Parker, the evolution of the human being. I’m only
seeing William Parker the bass legend, the established figure. They knew
him when he was the new guy on the scene. And honestly, the interview with
his daughter Miriam. She has an obviously special relationship, as his
daughter, but she can also speak to the evolving person he is, from when
she was little to today.”
Of course, hearing Bradley talk at length about his process, how he strived
to be open to what he heard from Parker and others, to really listening.
"This went through a peer review process with the publisher. There were
three external reviewers. And I really tried to make sure that William’s
voice was the strongest voice in the text. And it was to the point where,
in an earlier draft, someone said that William’s voice was stronger than
the author’s voice. And I pulled that back to where his voice carries the
narrative.”
This ended up being, I think, one of the more important aspects of our
conversations about the book. Because, and of course it already occurred to
me, we would be two white people who write about jazz, a historically Black
art form, discussing a work of biography about a prominent Black artist
from the South Bronx, whose music extends a through line that binds Duke
Ellington to Cecil Taylor. I’ve written about the knottiness of this
before, so it felt necessary that we talk about it, and Bradley—who at one
point simply said, “We need to have more conversations like this”—was keen
to do so, as well. It was a sincere and open conversation, and in that
respect, I’ll present what Bradley said to me as plainly as possible here:
“The question I asked repeatedly is, am I able to do this without causing
damage to the way he is portrayed? How might I misconstrue him? I think a
lot of white writers, it’s easy, subconsciously sometimes, it’s quite easy
to warp the narrative a little bit. Whether that’s making the narrative
about white people or not being aware of the assumptions one is making as a
writer.
“Fill the narrative with as many Black voices as possible, that was
something I tried to do. Because most bureaucratic documents and a lot of
historical resources out there are written by white people, who are maybe
misunderstanding what they’re seeing. It’s a judgement call, really. You
try to do the best you can; you see racism in the documents, all over the
place. And how do you pick through that? You do the best you can. [You let]
Black voices define the concepts as much as possible. What is William
Parker’s conception of what freedom is, for example, and not make
assumptions about what that might be. I tried to make sure he is defining
those terms and concepts and ideas. Because he thinks a lot about those
things. His work has a lot to do with that.
“I’ve tried to be humble about my approach to it, and I look forward to my
Black colleagues being critical about what I’ve said. As a white writer, I
can’t make that judgement. I can make certain judgements as a trained
historian, but there’s a large chunk of things I don’t think I can say. I
thought of myself as a guide, the person who gathers all of this together
and puts it forward.”
We agreed this is, we hope, the first of many books to be written about
Parker, about the loft scene, and about the scene that’s emerged in New
York with his support. To continue his work amplifying voices, Bradley is
getting ready to launch the Free Jazz Oral History project. It’s a broad
and ongoing project, begun in 2016 with the goal of “interviewing all the
people involved in the scene up to 1980. I’ve been trying to document
people’s stories in a very in-depth level.” If you haven’t looked into
them, there are already a number of more traditional oral history projects,
dedicated to jazz in general, to British jazz, and to other regional
voices. But the focus on the loft scene and the creative explosion of free
jazz in the 1970s is crucial: “I’ve been trying to be systematic about it.
I should say a lot of the people I’m talking to right now are between 70
and 85, and we’re going to lose them in the future. And other people are
doing projects too, to document those voices and their philosophies, their
life stories. I’ve been gradually making my way through, I’ve done about 50
interviews. This is the kind of crucial stuff we need, to be documenting
these histories, preferably in the words of the people who created that
music.” And this is probably the most important aspect of Universal Tonality, how many voices are there, on the page,
including Parker’s. It’s his story, most of all, but now it’s also ours, as
the audience, as the experiencers, as the ones who’ll carry it forward.
Order from Duke University Press
Or from Aum Fidelity